Day 67. It’s Debatable

Did you watch the debate last night?  I wasn’t planning to.  The first of the 2012 Presidential debates did me in; and I didn’t think I could inflict another one on myself.  But then, by about 8:00 p.m. I thought, “Who are you kidding?  Of course you’re going to watch.”

It wasn’t essential that I watch.  I’m a political junkie, but I’m not an American.  I don’t have a vote.  I’m not one of the ‘undecideds’, still trying to find a candidate I can believe in, and relate to.  But living in Canada, as I do, does make us close neighbours.  Whoever gets elected will make decisions that impact us.  Plus, if the U.S. continues to ‘hurt’, so will the rest of the world, Canada included, despite the fact that so far, we’ve weathered the storm better than most.  Whither thou goest, in other words.

So, yes, I did watch.  I’m not going to dissect every word that was spoken, though.  First, I’m not qualified.  Second, every pundit on the planet will be doing it, ad nauseum.  But I wouldn’t be me if I didn’t have something to say.  So here goes:

In my opinion, the clear winner last night was Martha Raddatz.  In case you didn’t watch, she was the moderator.  Her day job is being ABC’s Senior Foreign Affairs Correspondent.  She’s also written for The New Republic and she’s a frequent guest on PBS’s Washington Week.  In all the debates I can remember watching in recent history, she is the best moderator I’ve ever seen.

When she was first introduced she said she was taking her ‘job’ as moderator very seriously.  And that she did.  She took ownership of the debate.  She ran the show.  She asked tough questions.  Provocative questions.  Incendiary questions.  And when she didn’t think they were being answered, she was like a dog with a bone, going back time and again, repeating the questions, until she was satisfied.

She was part of the debate, not just some stiff, sitting in a chair.  You could easily see just how knowledgeable she is, and what a difference that made to the evening.  I’m sorry she isn’t moderating any of the Presidential debates, to be honest.  I loved, loved, loved the way she framed her question on abortion, tying it to religion.  And I thought Joe Biden’s answer was equally brilliant.  And refreshingly honest.   While Paul Ryan’s felt ‘scripted’.

Which brings me to my overall impression of last night’s debate.  I felt that Joe Biden was speaking from his heart, and from the vantage point of someone who is the working Vice President, and part of the current Administration.  He spoke from on-the-job experience and a lifetime in politics.  It didn’t seem as though a team of writers told him what to say.  I don’t feel that way about Paul Ryan’s performance.

For the record, I’m not referring to what they said.  I’m referring to how they expressed themselves, to their demeanour, to their conviction, to their body language, to their comfort; and discomfort.  To the ease with which they were able to explain and defend their positions; and the positions of the men, and parties, they serve.

And in that, Joe Biden, was the winner, hands down.  At least I think so.  Having said that, I do think he over did it with the interruptions.  I loved his passion and enthusiasm, but it was rude.  And unnecessary, because he had so much else going for him.  I’m not making excuses for him, but he was in a tough spot.  His boss made a shambles of his first debate, the Libyan debacle is not helping his cause, he’s not doing well in the polls and election day is upon us.  So he didn’t just have to hold his own last night, like Paul Ryan did.  He had to rehabilitate his boss’s performance, both as far as his debate is concerned, and in the White House.  So he overcompensated.

But to make that the focal point of the debate, and who won, is ridiculous.  But I think it is happening, at least to some degree.  I watched CNN last night and the post-debate discussion among the pundits began with Joe Biden’s interruptions.  Are you kidding me?   Less than a month to go in this campaign and you’re going to talk about manners?

Joe Biden made his case.  He was articulate.  He backed his statements up with many facts, not the least of which is the indisputable fact that he is there, in the job.  He’s not conjecturing.  He knows.  He hammered that home time and time and time again.  And to me, that was significant.  And Paul Ryan waffled.  And wriggled.  And tried to skirt a lot of the issues.   And happily, Martha Raddatz was there to make sure he didn’t get away with it.

I didn’t think it was a draw.  What do you think?  I hope you take the time to comment.  Let’s have a debate of our own.

6 thoughts on “Day 67. It’s Debatable

  1. I agree with you. Martha Raddatz did an excellent job, though I’m not sure that the guys weren’t somewhat deferring to her because she’s, you know, female. I think both guys got their talking points in–we’ll just have to see what the voters think about the different directions each party wants to go in.

    • Thanks for taking the time to comment. I didn’t get the feeling the guys were deferring to her because she’s a female. I don’t think her ‘femaleness’ was an issue at all, actually. She’s smart, knowledgeable, all business, no nonsense, regardless of her sex. And yes, I agree, ultimately it will be up to the voters. Always is, of course. But it all just gets mucked up by the vitriole, the endless nit-picking of the non-essential etc. That’s what I lived about Martha Raddatz last night. She tried to get some real information, real positions, real beliefs, real direction — so voters could get something to help them make their decisions. And that’s a first — not just in the debates, but in all the coverage and all the interviews.

      • I didn’t mean to suggest that she doesn’t know her stuff–I was impressed by the way she would jump in with a relevant question when one of them would go off on a tangent. It was just that, as soon as she would start speaking, both their mouths would snap shut as though they were on hinges. I don’t think they’d do that if the moderator were Bob Beckel.

      • Nor was I implying. I just don’t feel the male-female dynamic you’re feeling. Doesn’t make me right or wrong. Doesn’t make you right or wrong. Just different impressions. But it is an interesting point. Would love to know how others feel about it. Let’s go drum up some more opinions.

  2. Fransi, I watched as well, and agree that Martha did a good job. I also thought when Joe was not reacting, and interupting he won with the message.

    What I don’t get is why the democracts keep missing the small but critical details. I cringed as Joe kept laughing and smiling. I would have thought the democrats would be sophisticated enough to know how that might take away from his message. I found it particularly surprising because it was his lack of reaction and composure 4 years ago that exposed Palin.

    I like Biden. I witnessed him walking Whistler Village during the Vancouver Olympics and he was a magical pied piper who had the crowd in the palm of his hands.

    I just don’t get why the Obama Campain would not be more focused on the small points. The race is too close. The stakes are too high. Ryan and Romney are hiding their true intentions. They will have incredible pressure to deliver to their deeply socially conservative base if they get elected.

    The 12 million jobs and 4% growth is bullshit. Absolutely no plan to make it remotely credible. You would think they live on a planet without a European Debt Crisis and a slowing Chinese economy. At least the economic measures continue to be more positive in the US. Maybe that will save Obama and those of us who care about more than just own interests, and don’t want to see women take a step back.

    • Agree with everything you’ve said. I don’t get it either. Personally I am biting my nails. Obama has been far from perfect. But Romney and Ryan make me nervous.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.